Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Dave Nellist Launches TUSC Campaign For Staffordshire



“On Monday the 14th January, despite freezing conditions and snow-covered roads seventeen people attended a meeting in Newcastle-Under-Lyme to hear Dave Nellist give a talk about the importance of TUSC in this May’s forthcoming elections, and to appeal to those in attendance to consider standing as a candidate in their area.
Dave Nellist at TUSC meet Newcastle 16 Jan 2013
Dave Nellist speaking at the TUSC meeting in Newcastle
Dave started by outlining the disillusionment of voters and the fact that there is not a “cigarette paper” between the policies of the 3 main parties. He discussed the role that TUSC has to play in opposing these policies, and drew on several examples in history where the labour movement was successful in driving back the austerity measures of the day. And in case anyone in the room was under the illusion that Labour would provide a remedy to these cuts, Dave informed us about the appalling record that Labour had in expelling any of their councillors who dared to vote against cuts!
In the discussion afterwards Dave addressed comments regarding economic growth and debt, stating that ‘debt’ is meaningless; as an MP he witnessed Thatcherite ministers wipe debts from the public service to make them appear more profitable to private companies, and that we could solve the national debt in one fell swoop by taxing the mega rich and giving control of the state back to ordinary working-class people.
TUSC banner pic
This year we already plan to stand across the whole of Staffordshire where we can, including Newcastle-under-Lyme, Stafford, Burton and Leek. We see this as a positive step in the growth of TUSC, and in our contact with working-class people who more and more are identifying with socialist ideas.
At the end of the meeting at least another 3 people are seriously considering standing as TUSC candidates in May. This is a vast improvement from last year, when we had just 2 candidates standing across the borough of Newcastle-Under-Lyme.”

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

Public Meeting to Launch TUSC Staffordshire Election Campaign

Local Elections May 2013 

TUSC standing candidates to
Fight Against Cuts!

Speakers;

Dave Nellist - a real Socialist MP who took only the average workers wage and others from NUT, Unison, CWU.

Mon 14 January 2013 – 7.30pm

Holy Trinity Community Centre, London Rd (A34)

Newcastle, Staffs ST5 1LQ

All Welcome * * * * *

Trade Unionist & Socialist Coalition Staffordshire

http://stoke-and-newcastle-tusc.blogspot.co.uk/

www.tusc.org.uk

Staffordshire TUSC supporters are building a team of candidates to stand in the May 2013 local elections. Already, potential candidates – including locally based trade union activists, socialists, community campaigners – have come forward in Newcastle, Leek, Stafford and Burton-on-Trent.

The TUSC Public Meeting in Newcastle on 14 January 2013 will launch our campaign and we invite you to come along to volunteer as a potential candidate, support the campaign or just to find our more about TUSC. 

Dave Nellist is our main speaker. Dave has a proud record previously as a real socialist Labour MP and later Coventry Socialist Party councillor. For 9 years as an MP Dave refused to accept all his Parliamentary salary and instead lived on the average wage of working class people in Coventry.

Along with other Socialists, Dave was expelled from the Labour Party as it lurched further to the right to become a party fundamentally no different to the Tories. Dave is now a national coordinator of TUSC.

Monday, 12 November 2012

Spain in Revolt.


Spain in Revolt
Since the fall of Franco Spain has been in a kind of ‘leftover’ state – the reintroduction of democracy saw a positive mood that continued for decades as a victory over fascism. The demands of the working-class, that were laid out during the civil war had returned with the fall of Franco.
Of course, it was the capitalist class that declared the ‘victory’, with the transition to democracy bringing about an economic boom, but still problems persisted in Spain.
The restructuring of Spain’s economy brought about a number of things, primarily the destruction of the manufacturing industries that Spain relied on. Instead, the economic model was based on:
1.       Tourism.
2.       Service Industries.
3.       Housing and Financial Sector.

With the economy becoming vulnerable in 2007, like the rest of the world, the crisis hit Spain’s finance and construction industries. The state then took on the national debts.
As a consequence of this, unemployment hit 25 percent; a figure which does not include part-time employment. Some regions, including AndalucĂ­a, that figure reached 35 percent.
Like Britain, the crisis has had a hard impact on youth; 52 percent of young people are unemployed.
For the first time last year there were more people leaving Spain than entering.
In 2012 around 50000 Spanish people lost their homes. The economic model of Spain is such that if house payments are even missed by one payment, the bank can force the house to go to auction and buy it back for a lower price. Even then the family evicted still has to pay the bank the original mortgage payments! And with a weak welfare state, people have become more dependent on charities and families.
At first the government denied the crisis was happening, then accepted the austerity policies from the EU. The austerity measures in Spain were amongst the biggest in Europe.
The Spanish government introduced labour reforms that roll back the gains won by workers in struggles – there were tax increases, dole cut, increased retirement age and the dismantling of the welfare state. These policies were introduced by the politics of fear – they were told that this was an  inevitability, there were no other alternatives, and there was a danger of being expelled from the Eurozone.
Before serious struggle and protests were mounted, a climate of repression took over. There were arrests of key trade union leaders made and violence was used by the police in demonstrations that took place. Agent provocateurs were used in order to whip up violence in order to justify the repressive methods used by police.
In spite of this the 14th November sees the 3rd general strike taking place in 2 years, as Spanish workers continue to struggle against austerity.
There are weaknesses for the working-class in Spain however. A lot of demonstrations have been locally based, and no national organisation has taken the struggles forward in a progressive way. Also, the union leaders tend to demobilize the workers, not mobilize, and they have been all too ready to accept the cuts from government.
The last strike, which took place in March, meant that it has taken 8 months to mobilize again. We denounce this strategy and believe that continuous action is needed to sustain a consistent and effective struggle.
Our comrades in Spain are part of Socialismo Revolucionario, and from the beginning of the crisis, have stated that these weaknesses exist. Our demands included the civil war demands to be reinstated, such as the justice in society and the separation of church and state.
The largest organisation that is considered left is the United Left. This party has characteristics that could make it to be a working-class party – it has a solid base and many socialist elements in its programme. But it also has a lot of reformist policies too. And at the same time it does not go far enough. They suggest nationalising only part of the banking sector, and supports a coalition government.
It is also made up of different left Tendencies. In Andalucia they formed a coalition with a party that implement cuts. They also allowed the right wing PP in other areas, and used their votes to stop the PP in other areas. They wanted a coalition with the SDP in Astorias but the rank and file members voted against it. Socialismo Revolucionario always supported United Left, but opposed austerity and puts forward alternatives.
The situation in Spain changes extremely quickly from day to day, but the same tendencies remain – fighting austerity, and with the PP government, this is difficult.
Like Britain, the struggle and strategies have come from below. In this respect the trade union leaders have had no choice but to support a struggle.
The 14th November strike is very important. It is the 1st general strike to include all sections of workers. However, the trade unions in the Basque Country have now pulled out, making it slightly more difficult. But the government have now shown signs of weaknesses, and this is reflected in the problems and divisions shown by government.

The ‘National’ Question.
In September a demonstration for independence opens up a question of nationality for Catalunya.
This question of independence is one that has arisen fairly quickly, and primarily as a result of the economic crisis. 3 years ago 20 percent of Catalan people wanted independence from Spain. Now, this figure is closer to 50 percent. The right wing Catalan government since the fall of Franco, the CIU, uses the question of independence as a smokescreen to the crisis even though they seem in favour of independence. Even now they are ambiguous, and implement austerity policies. The Catalan president made the elections solely on the basis of independence.
Socialists denounce the use of this nationalist question. We support the rights of self-determination, but we argue that social issues are more important to the workers of the whole of Spain. Successful independence for Catalunya can only be implemented with socialist policies.This is a historic opportunity for the left if socialists are prepared to intervene.
The far right have spread an anti-immigrant feeling amongst the populace. Only relatively recently was Spain opened up to immigration. Many people are blaming immigrants for their situation, and various areas around Barcelona have moved to the right. It is possible that a party may come in on xenophobic policies. There are, of course, differing layers of the right wing within the PP, so an outright fascist government may be complicated to achieve.
The most likely outcome is that the United Left will continue to grow. It needs to break with coalition alliances. If this happens then other left organisations could develop within its framework.
There is a growing sense of optimism within Spain’s working class, in challenging the government’s austerity measures. There is a strong feeling from children and pensioners for example, who have stood up to fight cuts. Indeed 75 percent of Spain’s population now support demos and strikes.
The post-Franco sense of optimism may have gone, but the workers of Spain are seeking to struggle like their Republican forebears in their demands.   

Sunday, 3 June 2012

Why the Original Star Wars Trilogy is more Beloved Than the Prequels.


The worldwide phenomenon of Star Wars has been a part of popular culture for 35 years. In fact it’s hard to imagine a time when we weren’t aware of a ‘galaxy far, far away’, or had no idea who Darth Vader or Boba Fett were.
The original Star Wars films are universally accepted as being more beloved than the prequels, or ‘new’ trilogy, even after 7 years have elapsed since the last film ‘The Revenge of the Sith.’ Why is this? Why, given that we live in an age that elevates special effects more than ever? The reasons are, I believe, numerous.
Firstly, the context that both sets of trilogies were released in differed greatly. In 1977 the ‘New Hollywood’ films of the star directors were everywhere. Scorcese, De Palma, Coppola, Bogdanovich and all those visionary filmmakers of the 70s were delivering their artistic, personal, and often pessimistic films that, whilst critically successful, presented audiences with a realistic and gritty experience; the time was right for a more fanciful movie full of spectacle to allow the audience an escape from these realistic movies, and in a sense, their own lives.
What’s more, two year earlier, George Lucas’ friend and fellow nerd Steven Spielberg released Jaws, which set the standard for all blockbusters that came after. The tide was turning, and studios were searching for big budget epics that would strike a chord with audiences and make huge profits.  
By the time the new trilogy came around with ‘The Phantom Menace’ in 1999, the context had changed considerably. Rather than setting a new trend like the originals, Lucas now releases Episode One amongst other films like ‘The Matrix’, and the soon-to-be-released Lord of the Rings trilogy; audiences were now used to seeing spectacular effects-laden movies, so Star Wars now had competition. Obviously this new prequel trilogy was going to be successful, that was a given, but George Lucas could no longer automatically assume that a more tech-savvy audience would respond to Star Wars in quite the same way this time.
However, it is not just a case of different contexts in which both trilogies were released. The simple fact is that still, the original trilogy is more beloved. Why? Well, there is the obvious argument that the new trilogy is just not that good. It has been noted that the main characters simply do not have the same chemistry that the original trilogy have. Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill, and Carrie Fisher shine in scenes together.  None of the numerous characters in the prequels, real or CGI, have quite the same chemistry, if any at all. The Force just isn’t as strong with this one.
Another big factor, I believe, is the age-old theme of how good and evil is presented. It is possible that the original trilogy is more beloved by audiences everywhere because we are under no illusions as to who’s good, and who is bad. A huge towering figure clad in black and a wrinkled old cloaked pensioner leave nothing to the imagination for people to identify with; the blue-eyed, blond young kid and the princess clad in white surely personify our perception of ‘good’. But in the new trilogy, the clone troopers, those equivalent forms of storm troopers, can now switch loyalties. What’s more, we know that throughout the course of the prequels, the main protagonist will grow up to become the series’ chief antagonist. Maybe we just want our heroes to be heroes and our villains to be uncomplicated villains for a film series to become beloved.
 
Lastly, to be slightly cynical for a moment, George Lucas was accused of pandering to the toy market in Return of the Jedi with the addition of the Ewoks, or, ‘those bunch of muppets.’ Serious fans of the series up to that point must have felt slightly aggrieved that kiddies were now being force-fed characters who were ready-made for the toy market. So how much more would these same fans respond to Jar Jar Binks? Beloved is surely not a word they would use for who, in their eyes, is one ‘cutesy’ character too far.

Though less beloved by fans than the original trilogy, and containing more stilted dialogue, more effects and more confusing taxation sub-plots, does still not warrant the claim that George Lucas stole millions of childhoods worldwide. Maybe when those younger fans of the newer trilogy grow up, the context then may be different and ‘Attack of the Clones’ might be regarded in the same way ‘The Empire Strikes Back’ has been for 3 decades. But I doubt it.

Monday, 14 May 2012

Library Cutbacks

So £735,000 is about to be cut from libraries across the region. Can we really be surprised, given we have just had an election in Newcastle? What is shocking is the swiftness of the attacks on this type of public service, and one on an already minimal existence.
   What's really disgraceful, is that this, I feel, is an attack on a lifestyle. I must surely not be the only person out there who, with excited anticipation, visited a local library growing up with a sense of wonder at all those books to borrow - for free! Now that possibility for kids, their parents, or both, is being eroded to a degree that people just won't bother going in the first place.
You may think this is being overly dramatic - that library services will continue in some form; they no doubt will, but by removing a desire to visit a library on a regular basis, what motivation is there for kids to get into reading in a way that remains with them their whole lives? And when you consider that Stoke-on-Trent (the biggest cuts culprit) doesn't exactly have a reputation for a high level of literacy, the council appear to have shot themselves in the foot. How can they hope to 'market' themselves as a thriving city when the vast majority of its population are the ones to suffer?
   These draconian cuts are getting more and more personal. And once more the working-classes are the ones paying for them - not just financially but socially and ideologically. It all comes back to holding down the prospects of ordinary working people whose avenues for learning are constantly shrinking.
  Welcome back Labour. Can you spell b*****ds?

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Local Elections

Today's the day for people to vote for TUSC. It will be interesting to see the results. Although we are not expecting to win, it is a very definite statement of intent from us.
On a stall last week a guy came up to the stall and asked how long we were there for. As Andy said, "until we achieve socialism!"
This is how we see TUSC and the Socialist Party in general.

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

There's...Something on the Wing.


As you may know, if you have any kind of freeview/Sky channels, Star Trek is doing the rounds in various guises. At the moment Voyager is being repeated a second time on Sky Atlantic, and the Next Generation has started again somewhere else.
   But at the moment I'm watching the Original Series on CBS Action. Not because I haven't seen them before, but because like the anally-retentive soul I am, they are in order.
   Though I remember them being shown (repeated, obviously) on BBC2 at some point, probably on Wednesday evenings and after the ill-fated Def 2, it's that old adage of vaguely remembering what happens in an episode and from what season - this time, to quote Kirk in Generations, I'm doing it right.
  I'm not a comic book guy-esque individual who can quote dialogue ad verbatim, (I've not even seen an episode of Deep Space Nine) rather the opposite, I actually find these episodes hilarious in their stiltedness. But I am writing this blog to highlight what I see as interesting differences between the Original series and later series', not necessarily stylistically, but culturally.
     The main thing that crops up in the 60's show is the fact that all strange situations/characters/events tend to be 'unexplained' - ie "somehow", "unknown", etc. Only this morning I was watching (on planner) the episode 'Miri'. (featuring a young Michael J Pollard! He of Scrooged, Bonnie and Clyde and Tango and Cash fame!) The ultimate line was delivered by Kirk to his log when describing a replica of Earth - "it seems impossible, and yet there it is", as if "there it is" solves the need for any feasible explanation!
   I'm not even halfway through the first season and I'm 'lol'ing already. "Seems unlikely, but what the hell!"
     The Next Generation on the other hand, started the trend actual Trekkies refer to as 'technobabble' - the gobbledegook that usually involves sensors, replicators, warp core, etc. Only in the first season do some of the old habits creep through. Even in '87 sometimes "something", or "unknown entities" creep through, or some other variation of "Captain, somehow, against all laws of physics, the planet has disappeared". Makes the Death Star explanation look credible! But by and large, the Next Gen gave some attempt of scientific explanations for causes and effects, even if they were unintelligible. By the time we get to Voyager, these scientific explanations and technobabble seem to be the only rationales given -  in this respect the series goes from ridiculous to being so rooted in actual physics or theories that I as the viewer just don't care!
  Still you've got to admit, the remastered Enterprise looks pretty damn good. (The ship, not the sacreligious series)
It's life Jim, but not as we've known it.